Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.33, No.4, 1200-1210, 2016
Monolaurin yield optimization in selective esterification of glycerol with lauric acid over post impregnated HPW/SBA-15 catalyst
Process optimization of selective esterification of glycerol with lauric acid catalyzed by highly uniformed SBA-15 catalysts post impregnated with 12-tungstophosphorus acid (HPW) has been elucidated via response surface methodology (RSM). The significance of factors including reaction time (t), reactants ratio (R) and temperature (T) was investigated and led to the development of response models for lauric acid conversion (R1) and monolaurin yield (R2). The optimized monolaurin yield operating condition (50% yield at t=3.18 h, R=4.6 and T=175 ℃) was identified by using the developed models with high accuracy (98% confidence level, small standard deviation and error) and reproducibility (3 times). Comparison done with reported results showed the good performance of developed catalyst with significant reduction in reaction time needed to achieve similar lauric acid conversion and monolaurin yield.
[References]
  1. Bell BM, Briggs JR, Campbell RM, Chambers SM, Gaarenstroom PD, Hippler JG, Hook BD, Kearns K, Kenney JM, Kruper WJ, CLEAN-Soil, Air, Water, 36, 657, 2008
  2. Johnson DT, Taconi KA, Environ. Prog., 26, 338, 2007
  3. Valliyappan T, Bakhshi NN, Dalai AK, Bioresour. Technol., 99(10), 4476, 2008
  4. Formo MW, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc., 31, 548, 1954
  5. Carlos A, Catalytic processing of glycerol to fuels and chemicals, in Next Generation Biofuels and bio-based Chemicals (2009), Trieste.
  6. Perez-Pariente J, Diaz I, Mohino F, Sastre E, Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 254(2), 173, 2003
  7. Kumar P, Srivastava VC, Mishra IM, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 32(9), 1774, 2015
  8. Abdullah WNW, Bakar WAWA, Ali R, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 32(10), 1999, 2015
  9. Hoo PY, Abdullah AZ, Chem. Eng. J., 250, 274, 2014
  10. Hoo P, Abdullah AZ, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 54(32), 7852, 2015
  11. Hoo PY, Abdullah AZ, Characteristics of post-Impregnated SBA-15 with 12-tungstophosphoric acid and correlation with catalytic activity in selective esterification of glycerol to monolaurate. in Extended Abstracts, International Conference on Chemical and Biochemical Engineering (2015), Paris. Available online: http://goo.gl/yPTzy3.
  12. Gagea BC, Lorgouilloux Y, Altintas Y, Jacobs PA, Martens JA, J. Catal., 265(1), 99, 2009
  13. Tropecelo AI, Casimiro MH, Fonseca IM, Ramos AM, Vital J, Castanheiro JE, Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 390(1-2), 183, 2010
  14. Hermida L, Abdullah AZ, Mohamed AR, J. Appl. Sci., 10, 3199, 2010
  15. Brahmkhatri V, Patel A, Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 403(1-2), 161, 2011
  16. Pouilloux Y, Abro S, Vanhove C, Barrault J, J. Mol. Catal. A-Chem., 149, 243, 1999
  17. Bhatti MS, Reddy AS, Thukral AK, J. Hazard. Mater., 172(2-3), 839, 2009
  18. Ejikeme EM, Aneke LE, Okonkwo GN, Ejikeme PCN, Benjamin NA, Int. J. Eng. Sci. Res. Technol., 2, 442, 2013
  19. Myers RH, Anderson-Cook CM, Response surface methodology:Process and product optimization using designed experiments, 705, Wiley (2009).
  20. Azargohar R, Dalai A, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 85, 219, 2005
  21. Kiran B, Thanasekaran K, Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad., 65, 840, 2011
  22. Cox S, Ghannam NA, Int. Food Res. J., 20, 1537, 2013
  23. Wu YY, Zhou SQ, Qin FH, Ye XY, Zheng K, J. Hazard. Mater., 180(1-3), 456, 2010
  24. Hafizi A, Ahmadpour A, Koolivand-Salooki M, Heravi MM, Bamoharram FF, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 19(6), 1981, 2013
  25. Panda A, Chen S, Shaw AC, Allore HG, J. Immunol. Methods, 398-399, 19, 2013
  26. Starzak ME, Maxwell-Boltzmann Distributions, in Energy and Entropy. Springer (2010).
  27. Bukhari NI, Kaur S, Bai SH, Hay YK, Bakar A, Majeed A, Kang YB, Anderson MJ, Statistical Design of Experiments on Fabrication of Starch Nanoparticles-A Case Study for Application of Response Surface Methods (RSM), 2008; Available online: http://goo.gl/AGF3jd.
  28. Demirel M, Kayan B, Int. J. Ind. Chem., 3, 1, 2012
  29. Osborne JW, Pract. Assess. Res. Eval., 15, 1, 2010
  30. Hermida L, Abdullah AZ, Mohamed AR, Chem. Eng. J., 174(2-3), 668, 2011
  31. Chiu JJ, Pine DJ, Bishop ST, Chmelka BF, J. Catal., 221, 2004
  32. Kotwal M, Deshpande SS, Srinivas D, Catal. Commun., 12, 1302, 2011
  33. Heykants E, Verrelst WH, Parton RF, Jacobs PA, Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal., 105, 1277, 1997
  34. Diaz I, Marquez-Alvarez C, Mohino F, Perez-Pariente J, Sastre E, J. Catal., 193(2), 295, 2000
  35. da Silva-Machado M, Cardoso D, Perez-Pariente J, Sastre E, Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal., 130, 3417, 2000
  36. Machado MD, Perez-Pariente J, Sastre E, Cardoso D, de Guerenu AM, Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 203(2), 321, 2000
  37. Mohino F, Diaz I, Perez-Pariente J, Sastre E, Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal., 142, 1275, 2002
  38. Diaz I, Mohino F, Perez-Pariente J, Sastre E, Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 242(1), 161, 2003
  39. Wibowo TY, Abdullah AZ, Zakaria R, Appl. Clay Sci., 50, 280, 2010
  40. Hermida L, Abdullah AZ, Mohamed AR, J. Porous Mat., 19, 835, 2012