Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.33, No.1, 265-270, 2016
Solvent recovery in solvent deasphalting process for economical vacuum residue upgrading
The solvent deasphalting (SDA) process is a heavy oil upgrading process and used to separate asphaltene, the heaviest and most polar fraction of vacuum residue (VR) of heavy oil, by using density differences, to obtain deasphalted oil (DAO). The SDA process consists of two main stages: asphaltene separation and solvent recovery. Solvent recovery is a key procedure for determining the operating cost of the SDA process, because it uses a considerable amount of costly solvent, the recovery of which consumes huge amounts of energy. In this study, the SDA process was numerically simulated by using three different solvents, propane, n-butane, and isobutane, to examine their effect on the DAO extraction and the effect of the operating temperature and pressure on solvent recovery. The process was designed to contain one extractor, two flash drums, and two steam strippers. The VR was characterized by identifying 15 pseudo-components based on the boiling point distribution, obtained by performing a SIMDIS analysis, and the API gravity of the components. When n-butane was used, the yield of DAO was higher than in the other cases, whereas isobutane showed a similar extraction performance as propane. Solvent recovery was found to increase with temperature and decrease with pressure for all the solvents that were tested and the best results were obtained for propane.
[References]
  1. Shi TP, Hu YX, Xu ZM, Su T, Wang RA, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 36(9), 3988, 1997
  2. Ahmaruzzaman M, Sharma DK, Energy Fuels, 20(6), 2498, 2006
  3. Shin S, Lee JM, Hwang JW, Jung HW, Nho NS, Lee KB, Chem. Eng. J., 257, 242, 2014
  4. Carrillo JA, Corredor LM, Fuel Process. Technol., 109, 156, 2013
  5. Chang N, Gu Z, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 31(5), 780, 2014
  6. Gearhart JA, Garwin L, Hydrocarb. Process., 55, 125, 1976
  7. Meyers RA, Handbook of petroleum refining processes, McGraw-Hill, New York (2004).
  8. Speight JG, Heavy and extra-heavy oil upgrading technologies, Gulf Professional Publishing, United Kingdom (2013).
  9. De Lasa H, Dogammau G, Ravella A, Chemical reactor technology for environmentally safe reactors and products, Springer, Canada (1992).
  10. Iqbal R, Khan A, Eng O, Floyd R, PTQ, 13, 31, 2008
  11. Huc A, Heavy crude oils: from geology to upgrading: an overview, Editions Technip (2010).
  12. Dadashev MN, Stepanov GV, Chem. Tech. Fuels Oils, 36(1), 8, 2000
  13. Subramanian M, Hanson FV, Fuel Process. Technol., 55(1), 35, 1998
  14. Luo P, Gu YG, Fluid Phase Equilib., 277(1), 1, 2009
  15. Ancheyta J, Centeno G, Trejo F, Marroquin G, Garcia JA, Tenorio E, Torres A, Energy Fuels, 16(5), 1121, 2002
  16. Trejo F, Centeno G, Ancheyta J, Fuel, 83(16), 2169, 2004
  17. Lee JM, Shin S, Ahn S, Chun JH, Lee KB, Mun S, Jeon SG, Na JG, Nho NS, Fuel Process. Technol., 119, 204, 2014
  18. Cardenas VOC, Koroishi ET, Quirino FAB, Rivarola FWR, Boss EA, Oliveira GWC, Maciel MRW, Filho RM, Medina LC, Chem. Eng. Trans., 11, 905, 2007
  19. Wang LS, Gmehling J, AIChE J., 45(5), 1125, 1999
  20. Bahrami P, Kharrat R, Mahdavi S, Ahmadi Y, James L, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 32(2), 316, 2015
  21. Haynes WM, CRC handbook of chemistry and physics, CRC Press (2012).
  22. Cao FH, Jiang D, Li WD, Du PA, Yang GZ, Ying WY, Chem. Eng. Process., 49(1), 91, 2010
  23. Villalanti DC, Raia JC, Maynard JB, High-temperature simulated distillation applications in petroleum characterization, in: Meyers RA (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry, Wiley, Chichester (2000).
  24. Mullins OC, Martinez-Haya B, Marshall AG, Energy Fuels, 22(3), 1765, 2008
  25. Groenzin H, Mullins OC, J. Phys. Chem. A, 103(50), 11237, 1999
  26. Zhao SQ, Xu ZM, Xu CM, Chung KH, Wang R, Fuel, 84(6), 635, 2005
  27. Ng SH, Energy Fuels, 11(6), 1127, 1997
  28. Kahre LC, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 18, 267, 1973