Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.33, No.1, 147-153, 2016
Ash deposition characteristics of Moolarben coal and its blends during coal combustion
We report a systematic and comprehensive laboratory investigation of the ash deposition behavior of Moolarben (MO) coal, which has recently begun to be imported into Korea. Ash deposition experiments were conducted in a drop tube reactor, and a water-cooled ash deposit probe was inserted into the reactor to affix the ash. The tests were conducted using five types of single coals (two bituminous and three sub-bituminous, including MO coal) and blended coals (bituminous coal blended with sub-bituminous coal). Two indices represent ash deposition behavior: capture efficiency and energy-based growth rate. A thermomechanical analysis evaluated the melting behavior of the resulting ash deposits. The MO coal had the least ash deposition of the single coals due to its high melting temperature, indicated by high ash silica content. Indonesian sub-bituminous coals formed larger ash deposits and were sticky at low temperatures due to relatively high alkali content. However, blends with MO coal had greater ash deposition than blends with other bituminous coals. This non-additive behavior of MO coal blends is likely due to interactions between ash particles. Coals with higher silica content more effectively retain alkali species, resulting in lower melting temperatures and larger ash deposits. Therefore, we recommend that when blending in a boiler, silica-rich coals (SiO2>80%, SiO2/Al2O3>5) should be blended with relatively low-alkali coals (Na2O+K2O<3%), and the blending ratio of the silica-rich coals indicates less than 10%, which can safely operate the boiler.
[References]
  1. Li F, Huang J, Fang Y, Wang Y, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 30(3), 605, 2013
  2. Yuan G, Zhang J, Zhang Y, Yan Y, Ju X, Sun J, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 32(3), 436, 2015
  3. Bryers RW, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 22(1), 29, 1996
  4. Reg BT, The assessment of fouling and slagging propensity in combustion systems, in: Benson SA (Ed.), Proceedings of the Engineering Foundation Conference on Inorganic Transformations and Ash Deposition during Combustion in Palm Coast, Florida, March 10-15, 499 (1992).
  5. Scott DH, Ash Behavior During Combustion and Gasification, IEA Coal Research: London (1999).
  6. Bull DL, Ash deposition: A utility perspective, in: Benson SA (Ed.), Proceedings of the Engineering Foundation Conference on Inorganic Transformations and Ash Deposition during Combustion, March 10-15, 121 (1992).
  7. Rushdi A, Shanna A, Gupta R, Fuel, 83(4-5), 495, 2004
  8. Barroso J, Ballester J, Ferrer LM, Jimenez S, Fuel Process. Technol., 87(8), 737, 2006
  9. Lee BH, Kim SG, Song JH, Chang YJ, Jeon CH, Energy Fuels, 25(11), 5055, 2011
  10. Blanchard R, Measurements and modeling of coal ash deposition in an entrained flow reactor, MS Thesis. Brigham Young University, Provo (2008).
  11. Vargas S, Frandsen FJ, Dam-Johansen K, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 27(3), 237, 2001
  12. Watt JD, Fereday F, J. Inst. Fuel, 42, 99, 1969
  13. Seggiani M, Fuel, 77(14), 1611, 1998
  14. Zhang L, Jahanshahi S, Scand. J. Metall., 30, 364, 2001
  15. Wall TF, Creelman RA, Gupta RP, Gupta SK, Coin C, Lowe A, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 24(4), 345, 1998
  16. Zhang L, Jahanshahi S, Scand. J. Metall., 30, 364, 2001
  17. Hiroshi N, Nobuya I, Takayuki K, Tsuyoshi T, Tadashi I, Yoshiaki I, Ryo Y, Ichiro N, Proc. Combust. Inst., 32, 2709, 2009
  18. McLennan AR, Bryant GW, Bailey CW, Stanmore BR, Wall TF, Energy Fuels, 14(2), 349, 2000
  19. Browning GJ, Bryant GW, Hurst HJ, Lucas JA, Wall TF, Energy Fuels, 17(3), 731, 2003
  20. Oleschko H, Muller M, Energy Fuels, 21(6), 3240, 2007
  21. Wu H, Bashir MS, Jensen PA, Sander B, Glarborg P, Fuel, 113, 632, 2013
  22. Wall TF, Creelman RA, Gupta RP, Gupta SK, Coin C, Lowe A, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 24(4), 345, 1998