Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.32, No.1, 30-36, 2015
Bubble point measurement and high pressure distillation column design for the environmentally benign separation of zirconium from hafnium for nuclear power reactor
We examined the feasible separation of ZrCl4 and HfCl4 through high pressure distillation as environmentally benign separation for structural material of nuclear power reactor. The bubble point pressures of ZrCl4 and HfCl4 mixtures were determined experimentally by using an invariable volume equilibrium cell at high pressure and temperature condition range of 2.3-5.6MPa and 440-490 ℃. The experimental bubble point pressure data were correlated with Peng-Robinson equation of state with a good agreement. Based on the vapor-liquid equilibrium properties evaluated from the experimental data, the feasibility of high pressure distillation process for the separation of ZrCl4 and HfCl4 was investigated with its main design condition through rigorous simulation using a commercial process simulator, ASPEN Hysys. An enhanced distillation configuration was also proposed to improve energy efficiency in the distillation process. The result showed that a heat-pump assisted distillation with a partial bottom flash could be a promising option for commercial separation of ZrCl4 and HfCl4 by taking into account of both energy and environmental advantages.
[References]
  1. Franklink DG, Lang PM, Zirconium . Alloy Corrosion: A review based on an IAEA meeting, In Zirconium in Nuclear Industry, Ninth International Symposium, Philadelphia, 3 -32, 1991
  2. Sathiyamoorthy D, Shetty SM, Bose DK, Gupta CK, High Temp. Mater. Processes, 18, 213, 1999
  3. Annual Book of ASTM Standards: part 8, Nonferrous Metals-Nickel, Lead and Tin Alloys, Precious Metals, Primary Metals; Reactive Metals, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 1976
  4. Moulin L, Thouvenin P, Brun P, Paper presented at the 6th international conference on zirconium in the nuclear industy, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, 1982
  5. Branken DJ, M.S. Thesis, North-West University, 2009
  6. Vinarov IV, Russ. Chem. Rev., 36, 522, 1967
  7. Tricot R, J. Nucl. Mater., 189, 277, 1992
  8. Moulin L, Thouvenin P, Brun P, ASTM Spec. Tech. Publ., 284, 37, 1984
  9. Lee ED, McLaughlin DF, US Patent, 4,913,778, 1990
  10. Nandi B, Das NR, Bhattacharyya SN, Solvent Extr. Ion Exch., 1, 141, 1983
  11. Delons L, Picard G, Tigreat D, US Patent, 6,929,786 B2, 2005
  12. Kroll WJ, Schleckten AW, Yerkes LA, Trans. Electrochem. Soc., 89, 263, 1946
  13. Denisova ND, Safronov EK, Pustil’nik AI, Bystrova ON, Russ. J. Phys. Chem., 41, 30, 1967
  14. Bromberg ML, US Patent, 2,852,446, 1958
  15. Ishikuza H, Eur. Patent, 45270, 1982
  16. Duarte ARC, Mooijer-van den Heuvel MM, Duarte CMM, Peters CJ, Fluid Phase Equilib., 214(2), 121, 2003
  17. Tangri RP, Bose DK, Gupta CK, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 40(4), 823, 1995
  18. Palko AA, Ryan AD, Kuhn DW, J. Phys. Chem., 62, 319, 1958
  19. Kim JD, Spink DR, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 19, 36, 1974
  20. Li H, Nersisyan HH, Park KT, Park SB, Kim JG, Lee JM, Lee JH, J. Nucl. Mater., 413, 107, 2011
  21. Chen CC, Mathias PM, AIChE J., 48(2), 194, 2002
  22. Elliot JR, Lira CT, Introductory chemical engineering thermodynamics, Prentice-Hall Inc., NJ, 1999
  23. Kim JH, Kim MS, Fluid Phase Equilib., 238(1), 13, 2005
  24. Lee JM, Lee BC, Cho CH, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 17(5), 510, 2000
  25. Shi YH, Liu HL, Wang K, Xiao WD, Hu Y, Fluid Phase Equilib., 234(1-2), 1, 2005
  26. Peng DY, Robinson DB, Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam., 15, 59, 1976
  27. ANNAKOU O, MIZSEY P, Heat Recov. Syst. CHP, 15(3), 241, 1995
  28. Jana AK, Appl. Energy, 87(5), 1477, 2010
  29. Chew JM, Reddy CCS, Rangaiah GP, Chem. Eng. Process., 76, 45, 2014
  30. Long NVD, Lee M, Energy, 57, 663, 2013
  31. Kiss AA, Landaeta SJF, Ferreira CAI, Energy, 47(1), 531, 2012