Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.30, No.7, 1493-1496, 2013
Statistical optimization of mixture ratio and particle size for dry co-digestion of food waste and manure by response surface methodology
Response surface methodology has been widely applied to optimize the process. However, it was rarely applied to dry digestion. We used central composite design to optimize the anaerobic dry co-digestion of food waste and manure. Mixture ratio and particle size of food waste and manure were selected as independent variables, and target surface response was the methane production yield (MPY). BMP tests were conducted, and MPY was fitted by a secondorder polynomial quadratic model, which was found to be significant with higher coefficient (R2=0.98). As results of F-value analysis, the mixture ratio was found to be more important than particle size. Finally, the optimum conditions of mixture ratio (food waste :manure=5.79 : 4.21) corresponding to 15.6 of C/N ratio and particle size 1.12 cm were determined. In addition, 313mL CH4/g VSadded of MPY was anticipated under optimum conditions with 94.4% of desirability.
[References]
  1. Management of organic wastes, Ministry of Environment, Korea, 2009
  2. Mata-Alvarez J, Mace S, Llabres P, Bioresour. Technol., 74(1), 3, 2000
  3. Lu J, Gavala HN, Skiadas IV, Mladenovska Z, Ahring BK, J. Environ. Manage., 88(4), 1361, 2008
  4. Luning L, Van Zundert EHM, Brinkmann AJK, Water Sci. Technol., 48(4), 15, 2003
  5. Li Y, Park SY, Zhu J, Renew. Sust. Energy Rev., 15, 821, 2011
  6. Kim IS, Kim D, Hyun SH, Water Sci. Technol., 41(3), 67, 2000
  7. Sung S, Liu T, Chemosphere., 53, 43, 2003
  8. Kuo WC, Cheng KY, Bioresour. Technol., 98(9), 1805, 2007
  9. Nielsen HB, Angelidaki I, Bioresour. Technol., 99(17), 7995, 2008
  10. Mshandete A, Bjornsson L, Kivalisi AK, Rubindamayugi MST, Mattiasson B, Renew. Energy., 31, 2385, 2006
  11. Izumi K, Okishio YK, Nagao N, Niwa C, Yamamoto S, Toda T, Int. Biodeter. Biodegr., 64(7), 601, 2010
  12. Riano B, Molinuevo B, Garcia-Gonzalez MC, Bioresour. Technol., 102(5), 4131, 2011
  13. Gonzalez-Fernandez C, Molinuevo-Salces B, Garcia-Gonzalez MC, Appl. Energy, 88(10), 3448, 2011
  14. Li Y, Yan XL, Fan JP, Zhu JH, Zhou WB, Bioresour. Technol., 102(11), 6458, 2011
  15. APHA, AWWA and WEF, 20th Ed. Baltimore, American Public Health Association, 2, 57, 2008
  16. Jeihanipour A, Niklasson C, Taherzadeh MJ, Process Biochem., 46, 1509, 2011
  17. Lin CY, Lay CH, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy., 29, 41, 2004
  18. Kim DH, Kim SH, Kim KY, Shin HS, Int. J. Hydrog.Energy., 35, 1590, 2010
  19. Sreethawong T, Chatsiriwatana S, Rangsunvigit P, Chavadej S, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy., 35, 4092, 2010
  20. Bouallagui H, Lahdheb H, Ben Romdan E, Rachdi B, Hamdi M, J. Environ. Manage., 90, 1844, 2009
  21. Sievers DM, Brune DE, Am. Soc. Agr. Biol. Eng., 21, 537, 1978
  22. Sharma SK, Mishra IM, Sharma MP, Saini JS, Biomass., 17, 251, 1988
  23. El-Mashad H, Zhang R, Am. Soc. Agr. Biol. Eng., 50(5), 1815, 2007