Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.30, No.6, 1339-1346, 2013
Production of furfural and cellulose from barley straw using acidified zinc chloride
An effective fractionation process was sought to produce furfural and cellulose-rich solid from barley straw. Acidified zinc chloride (ZnCl2) was used as a catalyst in order to achieve hemicellulose recovery in the form of liquid hydrolysate. This fractionation process recovered 55.6% of XM (xylan and mannan) in the untreated barley straw under best reaction conditions (10% acidified ZnCl2, 150 ℃, 30 min, and 1/15 of S/L ratio). Hemicellulose hydrolysate was converted into furfural using hydrothermal reaction without additional catalyst. The furfural conversion yield at various reaction temperatures (150, 180, and 210 ℃) was in the range of 59.9-64.5%. The two parameters that affected performance in fractionation processing were reaction temperature and time. Reaction severity (Log R0) was used to evaluate the effects of two processing parameters on hemicellulose recovery. In the ZnCl2 treatment, the data indicated that the proper range of severity was 2.95-3.07 because the XM recovery yield decreased as the reaction condition became more severe beyond that point.
[References]
  1. Wright JD, Power AJ, Biotechnol. Bioeng. Symp., 15, 511, 1985
  2. Wright JD, Power AJ, Bergeron PW, Evaluation of concentrated halogen acid hydrolysis processes for alcohol fuel production, SERI/TR-232-2386, Golden, CO, NREL, 1985
  3. Mabee WE, Saddler JN, Bioresour. Technol., 101(13), 4806, 2010
  4. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL)-National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Top value added chemicals from biomass: results of screening for potential candidates from sugars and synthesis gas, Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, TN, 2010
  5. Ragauskas AJ, Williams CK, Davison BH, Britovsek G, Cairney J, Eckert CA, Sci., 311, 484, 2006
  6. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). http://www.nrel.gov.Accessed, July 20, 2012
  7. Sahoo S, Seydibeyoglu MO, Mohanty AK, Misra M, Biomass Bioenerg., 35(10), 4230, 2011
  8. Jung TS, Choi CH, Lee JY, Oh KK, Bioresour. Technol., 116, 435, 2012
  9. Choi CH, Um BH, Kim YS, Oh KK, Appl. Energy., 102, 640, 2013
  10. Park JY, Kang MS, Kim JS, Lee JP, Choi WI, Lee JS, Bioresour. Technol., 123, 707, 2012
  11. Nikitin NI, Isr. Program for Sci. Transl., 74, 1966
  12. Cao NJ, Xu Q, Chen CS, Gong CS, Chen LF, Appl. Biochem.Biotechnol., 45/46, 521, 1994
  13. Lu Q, Wang Z, Dong CQ, Zhang ZF, Zhang Y, Yang YP, Zhu XF, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol., 91, 273, 2011
  14. Cao NJ, Xu Q, Chen LF, Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol., 51/52, 21, 1995
  15. Sluiter J, Sluiter A, Summative mass closure, NREL/TP-510-48087, 2011
  16. Sluiter A, Hames B, Ruiz R, Scarlata C, Sluiter J, Templeton D, Crocker D, Determination of structural carbohydrates and lignin in biomass, NREL/TP-510-42618, 2008
  17. Sluiter A, Hames B, Ruiz R, Scarlata C, Sluiter J, Templeton D, Determination of sugars, byproducts, and degradation products in liquid fraction process samples, NREL/TP-510-42623, 2008
  18. Overend RP, Chornet E, Philos. Trans. R. Soc., A321, 523, 1987
  19. Chum HL, Johnson DK, Black SK, Overend RP, Appl.Biochem. Biotechnol., 24/25, 1, 1990
  20. Yoo CG, Lee CW, Kim TH, Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol., 164(6), 729, 2011
  21. Kim TH, Lee YY, Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol., 137-140(1-12), 81, 2007
  22. Weiss ND, Nagle NJ, Tucker MP, Elander RT, Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol., 155(1-3), 418, 2009
  23. Mabee WE, Saddler JN, Bioresour. Technol., 101(13), 4806, 2010
  24. Zeitsch KJ, The chemistry and technology of furfural and its many by-products, Elsevier, Koln, 2000
  25. Sangarunlert W, Piumsomboon P, Ngamprasertsith S, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 24(6), 936, 2007