Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.30, No.6, 1181-1186, 2013
Fault detection in nonlinear chemical processes based on kernel entropy component analysis and angular structure
Considering that kernel entropy component analysis (KECA) is a promising new method of nonlinear data transformation and dimensionality reduction, a KECA based method is proposed for nonlinear chemical process monitoring. In this method, an angle-based statistic is designed because KECA reveals structure related to the Renyi entropy of input space data set, and the transformed data sets are produced with a distinct angle-based structure. Based on the angle difference between normal status and current sample data, the current status can be monitored effectively. And, the confidence limit of the angle-based statistics is determined by kernel density estimation based on sample data of the normal status. The effectiveness of the proposed method is demonstrated by case studies on both a numerical process and a simulated continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) process. The KECA based method can be an effective method for nonlinear chemical process monitoring.
[References]
  1. Jackson JE, Technometrics., 1, 359, 1959
  2. Qin SJ, J. Chemometr., 17, 480, 2003
  3. Kresta JV, Macgregor JF, Marlin TE, Can. J. Chem. Eng., 69, 35, 2009
  4. Lee JM, Yoo CK, Choi SW, Vanrolleghem PA, Lee IB, Chem. Eng. Sci., 59(1), 223, 2004
  5. Liu XQ, Xie L, Kruger U, Littler T, Wang SQ, AIChE J., 54(9), 2379, 2008
  6. Nomikos P, Macgregor JF, AIChE J., 40(8), 1361, 1994
  7. Pei XD, Yamashita Y, Yoshida M, Matsumoto S, J. Chem. Eng. Jpn., 41(1), 25, 2008
  8. Kim MH, Yoo CK, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 25(5), 947, 2008
  9. Han K, Park KJ, Chae H, Yoon ES, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 25(1), 13, 2008
  10. Chiang LH, Russell E, Braatz RD, Fault detection and diagnosis in industrial systems, Springer Verlag, 2001
  11. Ge ZQ, Yang CJ, Song ZH, Chem. Eng. Sci., 64(9), 2245, 2009
  12. Kramer MA, AIChE J., 37, 233, 1991
  13. Dong D, Mcavoy TJ, Comput. Chem. Eng., 20(1), 65, 1996
  14. Cui P, Li J, Wang G, Expert Syst. Appl., 34, 1210, 2008
  15. Jia F, Martin E, Morris A, Int. J. Syst. Sci., 31, 1473, 2000
  16. Choi SW, Lee C, Lee JM, Park JH, Lee IB, Chemom.Intell. Lab. Syst., 75, 55, 2005
  17. Nguyen VH, Golinval JC, Eng. Struct., 32, 3683, 2010
  18. Scholkopf B, Smola A, Muller KR, Neural Computation., 10, 1299, 1998
  19. Jenssen R, IEEE PAMI., 32, 847, 2010
  20. Jenssen R, Eltoft T, Neurocomputing., 72, 23, 2008
  21. Renyi A, On measures of entropy and information, in Proc. Fourth Berkeley Symp. on Math. Statist. and Prob., Univ. of Calif. Press, 1, 547, 1961
  22. Parzen E, The Annals of Mathematical Statistics., 33, 1065, 1962
  23. Dehnad K, Technometrics., 29, 495, 1987
  24. Scott DW, Density estimation, Encyclopedia of Biostatistics, 2005
  25. Webb AR, Statistical pattern recognition, Wiley, 2003
  26. Yoon SY, MacGregor JF, J. Process Control, 11(4), 387, 2001
  27. Yue HH, Qin SJ, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 40(20), 4403, 2001