Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.30, No.2, 262-268, 2013
The solids concentration distribution in the deep cone thickener: A pilot scale test
Cemented backfill or surface deposition of paste tailings is increasingly being considered as a simple and effective means of reducing the hazards of conventional slurry deposition and recovering water for recycle. Although gravity thickening has been widely used in the mineral industry to increase the solids concentration of tailings, the accurate prediction of the concentration distribution in three-dimensions and discontinuous operational state has proven to be difficult. We investigated the axial and radial solids concentration distribution at discontinuous state in a pilot deep cone thickener as a function of bed height and residence time. The feed flux of lead/zinc tailings was 0.254 t·h^(-1)·m^(-2) with a flocculant (high molecular weight anionic polyacrylamide) dose of 20 g/t. The thickened solids bed was sheared by a rotating rake at a rate of 0.2 rpm. The underflow was recirculated at a flux of 0.5 t·h^(-1)·m^(-2), which can introduce additional shear stresses into the bed. The results of the bed density profile showed that, beside the clarification zone, the area below the feedwell could be divided into four zones: the dilution zone caused by free settling and diffusing action, the hindered settling zone in which the concentration was lower than the gel point, the unraked bed zone with a large concentration gradient and, finally, the raking zone with the highest slurry concentration and lower concentration gradient.
[References]
  1. Zhang DZ, China Mine Engineering., 39(2), 49, 2010
  2. Wu AX, Granular dynamic theory and its applications, Metallurgical Industry Press & Springer, 2008
  3. Kretser RG, Scales PJ, Boger DV, British Society of Rheology., 12, 125, 2003
  4. Liu XH, Wu AX, Wang HJ, Metal Mine., 9, 38, 2009
  5. Jiao HZ, Wang HJ, Wu AX, Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing., 6, 702, 2010
  6. Zhai YG, Wu AX, Wang HJ, Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing., 7, 629, 2011
  7. Usher SP, Spehar R, Scales PJ, Chem. Eng. J., 151(1-3), 202, 2009
  8. Burger R, Karlsen KH, Towers JD, Chem. Eng. J., 111(2-3), 119, 2005
  9. Mpofu P, Addai-Mensah J, Ralston J, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 271(1), 145, 2004
  10. Zbik MS, Smart RSC, Morris GE, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 328(1), 73, 2008
  11. Braggs B, Fornasiero D, Ralston J, Clays Clay Minerals., 2, 123, 1994
  12. Tombaz E, Szekeres M, Appl. Clay Sci., 34, 105, 2006
  13. Du JH, Pushkarova RA, Smart RSC, Int. J. Miner. Process., 93(1), 66, 2009
  14. Shannon PT, Dehaas RD, Stroupe EP, Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundamentals., 3, 250, 1964
  15. Tory EM, Shannon PT, Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundamentals., 4, 194, 1965
  16. Landman KA, White LR, Buscall R, AIChE J., 34, 239, 1988
  17. Usher SP, Suspension dewatering characterization and optimization, P.h. D. Thesis, The University of Melbourne, Australia, 2002
  18. Landman KA, White LR, Eberl M, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci., 51, 175, 1994
  19. Bertrand J, Mavros P, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 83(A1), 1, 2005
  20. Burger R, Evje S, Karlsen KH, Lie KA, Chem. Eng. J., 80(1-3), 91, 2000
  21. Coe HS, Clevenger GH, Trans. AIME., 55, 356, 1916
  22. Wang W, Tan JP, Mining and Metallurgical Engineering., 1, 44, 2004
  23. Buscall R, White LR, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans., 83, 873, 1987
  24. Gladman BR, Rudman M, Scales PJ, Chem. Eng. Sci., 65, 13, 2010
  25. van Deventer BBG, Usher SP, Kumar A, Rudman M, Scales PJ, Chem. Eng. J., 171(1), 141, 2011
  26. Usher SP, Scales PJ, Chem. Eng. J., 111(2-3), 253, 2005