Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.26, No.6, 1556-1562, 2009
Characteristics and photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange on Ti-RH-MCM-41 and TiO2/RH-MCM-41
r purpose was to synthesize, characterize and test photodegradation of methyl orange on two catalysts containing 10 wt% titanium supported on mesoporous MCM-41 synthesized with rice husk silica. The first catalyst was Ti-RH-MCM-41 prepared by adding tetrabutyl orthotitanate (TBOT) in a synthetic gel of RH-MCM-41, and the second catalyst was TiO2/RH-MCM-41 prepared by grafting TBOT on the preformed RH-MCM-41. The mesoporous structures were observed on both catalysts and they had surface area of 1,073 and 1,006 m2/g. The Ti in Ti-RHMCM-41 was in the form of Ti(IV) with tetrahedral geometry residing in the mesoporous structure. This form was less active for photodegradation of methyl orange than the other one. The Ti in TiO2/RH-MCM-41 was anatase titania with octahedral geometry located outside the mesoporous framework. This form was more an active phase for the photodegradation and the reaction parameters on this catalyst were further investigated. The optimum catalyst weight to methyl orange volume ratio was 5 g/L and the optimum initial concentration of the dye was 2.0 ppm. The degradation rate obeyed pseudo-first order and the adsorption of methyl orange on TiO2/RH-MCM-41 obeyed Langmuir isotherm.
[References]
  1. Wang H, Nui J, Long X, He Y, Ultrason. Sonochem., 15, 386, 2008
  2. Neppolian B, Choi HC, Sakthivel S, Arabindoo B, Murugesan V, Chemosphere, 46, 1173, 2002
  3. Herrmann JM, Catal. Today, 53(1), 115, 1999
  4. Konstantinou IK, Albanis TA, Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 49(1), 1, 2004
  5. Nam WS, Han GY, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 20(6), 1149, 2003
  6. Nam WS, Han GY, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 20(1), 180, 2003
  7. Bhattacharyya A, Kawi S, Ray MB, Catal. Today, 98(3), 431, 2004
  8. Li G, Zhao XS, Ray MB, Sep. Purif. Technol., 55(1), 91, 2007
  9. Carp O, Huisman CL, Reller A, Prog. Solid. State. Chem., 32, 33, 2004
  10. Grisdanurak N, Chiarakorn S, Wittayakun J, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 20(5), 950, 2003
  11. Wittayakun J, Khemthong P, Prayoonpokarach S, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 25(4), 861, 2008
  12. Khemthong P, Prayoonpokarach S, Wittayakun J, Suranaree J. Sci. Technol., 14, 367, 2007
  13. Loiha S, Prayoonpokarach S, Songsiriritthigun P, Wittayakun J, Mater. Chem. Phys., 115, 637, 2009
  14. Srinivas D, Srivastava R, Ratnasamy P, Catal. Today, 96(3), 127, 2004
  15. Schacht P, Norena-Franco L, Ancheyta J, Ramirez S, Hernandez-Perez I, Garcia LA, Catal. Today, 98(1-2), 115, 2004
  16. Bordiga S, Coluccia S, Lamberti C, Marchese L, Zecchina A, Boscherini F, Buffa F, Genoni F, Leofanti G, Petrini G, Vlaic G, J. Phys. Chem., 98(15), 4125, 1994
  17. Shul YG, Oh KS, Yang JC, Jung KT, J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol., 8, 225, 1997
  18. Kitano M, Matsuoka M, Ueshima M, Anpo M, Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 325(1), 1, 2007
  19. Mrak M, Tusar NN, Logar NZ, Mali G, Kljajic A, Arcon I, Launay F, Gedeon A, Kaucic V, Micropor. Mesopor. Mater., 95, 76, 2006