|
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, Vol.39, No.10, 2725-2735, 2022
Comparative study of naproxen degradation via integrated UV/O3/PMS process: Degradation products, reaction pathways, and toxicity assessment
The present study comprehensively investigated the degradation of naproxen (NPX) using UV/O3/peroxymonosulfate (PMS), UV/O3, UV/PMS, and O3/PMS processes. The effects of various parameters such as PMS and ozone dosage, pH, and NPX concentration were investigated on process performance. Scavenging tests were conducted to identify the dominant radical species. The results under the optimal conditions show that the UV/O3/PMS process is highly efficient for NPX degradation within 30 min of reaction time. Synergy index was also calculated and it was found that ozonation of the UV/PMS process leads to higher removal efficiency and a synergy effect of about 25% was calculated. It was also found that after complete destruction of NPX molecules, 76.9% of TOC was also removed. The final degradation by-products was tracked and it was proved that hydroxylation and decarboxylation were the main pathways in NPX degradation in the UV/O3/PMS reactor. It was also proved that •OH was the main oxidizing agent in the UV/O3/PMS and accordingly the degradation mechanism of NPX was suggested. Cytotoxicity assessment of the process effluent indicated a noticeable reduction in the toxicity of the NPX-laden solution after treatment using UV/ O3/PMS process. Furthermore, cost analysis of the different oxidation processes for real wastewater indicated that UV/ O3/PMS is the most cost-effective process compared to that of other processes (112US$/m3). Accordingly, it can be put forth that the UV/O3/PMS process is a promising and reliable process for the degradation of naproxen.
[References]
- Lucero GMA, Marcela GM, Sandra GM, Manuel GOL, Celene RE, Water Air Soil Pollut., 226(6), 1, 2015
- Dong S, Zhai X, Pi R, Wei J, Wang Y, Sun X, Water Sci. Technol., 81(10), 2078, 2020
- Xu L, Ma X, Niu J, Chen J, Zhou C, J. Hazard. Mater., 379, 120692, 2019
- Yang Y, Pignatello JJ, Ma J, Mitch WA, Water Res., 89, 192, 2016
- Rehman F, Sayed M, Khan JA, Shah NS, Khan HM, Dionysiou DD, J. Hazard. Mater., 357, 506, 2018
- Zangeneh H, Zinatizadeh A, Feizy M, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 20(4), 1453, 2014
- Wang J, Wang S, Chem. Eng. J., 334, 1502, 2018
- Jiang F, Qiu B, Sun D, Chem. Eng. J., 349, 338, 2018
- Zhang X, Chen Z, Kang J, Zhao S, Wang B, Yan P, Deng F, Shen J, Chu W, J. Hazard. Mater., 4001, 123837, 2021
- Shao Y, Pang Z, Wang L, Liu X, Molecules, 24(16), 2874, 2019
- Mao Y, Dong H, Liu S, Zhang L, Qiang Z, Water Res., 173, 115615, 2020
- Khashij M, Mehralian M, Chegini ZG, Pig. Resin Technol., 49(5), 363, 2020
- Yuan Z, Sui M, Yuan B, Li P, Wang J, Qin J, Xu GJESWR, Environ. Sci-Wat. Res. Technol., 3(5), 960, 2017
- Cao Y, Qiu W, Zhao Y, Li J, Jiang J, Yang Y, Pang SY, Liu G, Chem. Eng. J., 401, 126, 2020
- Lin Z, Qin W, Sun L, Yuan X, Xia D, J. Water Process Eng., 38, 101636, 2020
- Liu Z, Demeestere K, Van Hulle S, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 9(4), 105599, 2021
- APHA, Federation, W. E., & APH Association. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association (APHA): Washington, DC, USA (2005).
- Moussavi G, Pourakbar M, Shekoohiyan S, Satari M, Chem. Eng. J., 331, 755, 2018
- Ling Y, Liao G, Xie Y, Yin J, Huang J, Feng W, Li L, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A-Chem., 329, 280, 2016
- Cuerda-Correa EM, Alexandre-Franco MF, Fernández-González C, Water, 12(1), 102, 2020
- Qin W, Lin Z, Dong H, Yuan X, Qiang Z, Liu S, Xia D, Water Res., 186, 116336, 2020
- Srithep S, Phattarapattamawong S, Chemosphere, 176, 25, 2017
- He X, Mezyk SP, Michael I, Fatta-Kassinos D, Dionysiou DD, J. Hazard. Mater., 279, 375, 2014
- Huang YH, Huang YF, Huang CI, Chen CY, J. Hazard. Mater., 170(2), 1110, 2009
- Hayon E, Treinin A, Wilf J, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 94(1), 47, 1972
- Oh WD, Dong Z, Lim TT, Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 194, 169, 2016
- Liu X, Zhang T, Zhou Y, Fang L, Shao Y, Chemosphere, 93(11), 2717, 2013
- Izadifard M, Achari G, Langford CH, Water Res., 125, 325, 2017
- Moussavi G, Pourakbar M, Aghayani E, Mahdavianpour M, Chem. Eng. J., 350, 673, 2018
- Guo L, Zhong Q, Ding J, Ou M, Lv Z, Song F, Ozone-Sci. Eng., 38(5), 382, 2016
- Behnami A, Croué JP, Aghayani E, Pourakbar M, RSC Adv., 11(58), 36965, 2021
- Xu Y, Wu Y, Zhang W, Fan X, Wang Y, Zhang H, Chem. Eng. J., 353, 626, 2018
- Deng J, Ge Y, Tan G, Wang H, Li Q, Zhou S, Zhang K, Chem. Eng. J., 330, 1390, 2017
- Chowdhury IH, Chowdhury AH, Bose P, Mandal S, Naskar MK, RSC Adv., 6(8), 6038, 2016
- Lim J, Hoffmann MR, Environ. Sci-Nano, 7(5), 1602, 2020
- Ball DL, Edwards JO, J. Phys. Chem., 62(3), 343, 1958
- Clarizia L, Russo D, Di Somma I, Marotta R, Andreozzi R, Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 209, 358, 2017
- Moussavi G, Rezaei M, Pourakbar M, Chem. Eng. J., 332, 140, 2018
- Moussavi G, Pourakbar M, Aghayani E, Mahdavianpour M, Shekoohyian S, Chem. Eng. J., 294, 273, 2016
- Zhou Y, Jiang J, Gao Y, Ma J, Pang SY, Li J, Lu XT, Yuan LP, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49(21), 12941, 2015
- Kanigaridou Y, Petala A, Frontistis Z, Antonopoulou M, Solakidou M, Konstantinou I, Deligiannakis Y, Mantzavinos D, Kondarides DI, Chem. Eng. J., 318, 39, 2017
- Gao X, Guo Q, Tang G, Peng W, Luo Y, He D, J. Water Reuse Desal., 9(3), 301, 2019
- Rekhate CV, Srivastava JK, Chem. Eng. J. Adv., 3, 100031, 2020
- Chou MS, Chang KL, Ozone-Sci. Eng., 29(5), 391, 2007
- Sharma J, Mishra IM, Dionysiou DD, Kumar V, Chem. Eng. J., 276, 193, 2015
- Scott M, Millar GJ, Altaee A, J. Water Process Eng., 31, 100806, 2019
- Liu G, Li X, Han B, Chen L, Zhu L, Campos LC, J. Hazard. Mater., 322, 461, 2017
- Méndez-Arriaga F, Giménez J, Esplugás S, J. Adv. Oxid. Technol., 11(3), 435, 2008
- Kanakaraju D, Motti CA, Glass BD, Oelgemöller M, Chemosphere, 139, 579, 2015
- Chin CJM, Chen TY, Lee M, Chang CF, Liu YT, Kuo YT, J. Hazard. Mater., 277, 110, 2014
|