Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.27, No.6, 1841-1846, 2010
Kinetic model of asymmetric reduction of 3-oxo-3-phenylpropionic acid ethyl ester using Saccharomyces cerevisiae CGMCC No.2266
The kinetic model of asymmetric reduction of 3-oxo-3-phenylpropionic acid ethyl ester using Saccharomyces cerevisiae CGMCC No.2266 with 10% glucose as co-substrate to realize the regeneration of NADPH was established. The effect factors on reduction, the type and the content of co-substrate and coenzyme, and the changes of the substrate and product content vs. time during the reaction process were investigated. The results indicate that 10% glucose can increase the reaction conversion from 23.0% to 98.4% and NADPH is reducer. The reduction process conforms with sequence mechanisms. The model parameters are as follows: v(m)=5.0×10^(-4) mol·L^(-1)·h^(-1), k(1)=1.5×10^(-6) mol·L^(-1)·h^(-1), k(2)=3.0×10^(-3) mol·L^(-1)·h^(-1). The kinetic model is in good agreement with the experimental data.
[References]
  1. Wang PY, Tsai SW, J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzymatic, 59, 70, 2009
  2. Miles WH, Elizabeth J, Fialcowitz, Halstead ES, Tetrahedron, 57, 9925, 2001
  3. Hilborn JW, Lu ZH, Jurgens AR, Fang QK, Byers P, Walda SA, Chris H, Tetrahedron Lett., 42, 8919, 2001
  4. Iliyas SA, Arumugam S, Tetrahedron Letters, 43, 5435, 2002
  5. He CM, Chang DL, Zhang J, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 19, 1347, 2008
  6. Lapis AAM, Fatima AD, Martins JED, Costab VED, Pillia RA, Tetrahedron Lett., 46, 495, 2005
  7. Nesterov VV, Kolodiazhnyi OI, Tetrahedron, 63, 6720, 2007
  8. Matsumae H, Douno H, Yamada S, Nishida T, Ozaki Y, Shibatani T, Tosa T, J. Ferment. Bioeng., 79(1), 28, 1995
  9. Lou WY, Zong MH, Zhang YY, Wu H, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 35(2-3), 190, 2004
  10. Li YN, Shi XA, Zong MH, Meng C, Dong YQ, Guo YH, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 40(5), 1305, 2007
  11. Zeng R, Yang ZH, Yao SJ, Chem. Ind. Eng. Progress, 23, 1169, 2004
  12. Wang ZL, Xu JH, Wang L, Zhang WZ, Zhuang BH, Qi HS, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 41(3), 296, 2007
  13. Holland HL, Current Opinion in Chemical Biology, 2, 77, 1998
  14. Tetsuo T, Kaori A, Nobuaki U, Yukiko T, Hisataka O, Kaoru N, Letter/J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzymatic, 60, 93, 2009
  15. Yu L, Pei XL, Lei T, Sci. Technol. Food Ind., 5, 100, 2008
  16. Xiao MT, Huang YY, Meng C, Guo YH, Chin. J. Chem. Eng., 14(1), 73, 2006
  17. Arinbasarova AY, Karpov AV, Fokina VV, Medentsev AG, Koshcheyenko KA, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 19(7), 501, 1996
  18. Antonio AR, Sandrine B, Anne GF, Peter JJ, Michele H, J. Biotechnol., 138, 88, 2008
  19. Bubis M, Zisapel N, Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, 137, 59, 1998
  20. Antonella DC, Luca C, Giulio R, Francesca B, Umberto M, Exp. Eye Res., 71, 515, 2000
  21. Ou Z, Wu J, Yang L, Cen P, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 25(1), 124, 2008
  22. Rickus JL, Chang PL, Tobin AJ, Zink JI, Dunn B, J. Phys. Chem. B, 108(26), 9325, 2004