|
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, Vol.37, No.9, 1490-1497, 2020
Coke combustion kinetics of spent Pt-Sn/Al2O3 catalysts in propane dehydrogenation
The kinetics of coke combustion was investigated by using a thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA) of coked catalysts which was used for propane dehydrogenation to determine the activation energy. Apart from the Pt/Al2O3 catalyst, four different Pt-Sn/Al2O3 catalysts were prepared by varying the Pt/Sn ratio from 3 : 0.5 to 3 : 3 by weight. The catalytic activity was measured by propane dehydrogenation at 620 °C. The reactant mixture consisting of C3H8 (30ml/ min) and H2 (30ml/min) was fed into the reactor for 5 h. A thermogravimetric analyzer in the presence of air was used to determine the amount of coke deposited and calculate the kinetic parameters for coke combustion. Three nonisothermal models (Friedman, Flynn-Wall-Ozawa (FWO), and Kissinger-Akahira-Sunose) were used to determine the activation energy and the best model to fit the experimental data. The FWO model provided the best fit for 3Pt/Al2O3 and 3Pt-0.5Sn/Al2O3. The three models were equivalent for fitting the data for 3Pt-1Sn/Al2O3, 3Pt-2Sn/Al2O3, and 3Pt-3Sn/Al2O3. The activation energy increased with increasing Sn addition in the 3Pt/Al2O3 catalyst. Differences in the locations and the qualitative features of the cokes were suggested to interpret the results.
[References]
- Sattler JJHB, Ruiz-Martinez J, Santillan-Jimenez E, Weckhuysen BM, Chem. Rev., 114(20), 10613, 2014
- Nawaz Z, Rev. Chem. Eng., 31(5), 413, 2015
- Bhasin MM, McCain JH, Vora BV, Imai T, Pujado PR, Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 221(1-2), 397, 2001
- Stagg SM, Querini CA, Alvarez WE, Resasco DE, J. Catal., 168(1), 75, 1997
- Vora BV, Top. Catal., 55, 1297, 2012
- Sattler JJHB, Gonzalez-Jimenez ID, Luo L, Stears BA, et al., Angew. Chem.-Int. Edit., 53, 9251, 2014
- Jung JW, Kim WI, Kim JR, Oh K, Koh HL, Catalysts, 9, 446, 2019
- Wang HZ, Sun LL, Sui ZJ, Zhu YA, Ye GH, Chen D, Zhou XG, Yuan WK, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 57(26), 8647, 2018
- Ochoa A, Ibarra A, Bilbao J, Arandes JM, Castano P, Chem. Eng. Sci., 171, 459, 2017
- Weisz PB, Goodwin RB, J. Catal., 6, 227, 1966
- Weisz BB, J. Catal., 6, 425, 1966
- Doolin PK, Hoffman JF, Mitchell MM, Appl. Catal., 71, 233, 1991
- Babich IV, Seshan K, Lefferts L, Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 59(3-4), 205, 2005
- Zagoruiko AN, Belyi AS, Smolikov MD, Noskov AS, Catal. Today, 220, 168, 2014
- Mehraban M, Shahraki BH, Fuel Process. Technol., 188, 172, 2019
- Luo S, He SB, Li XR, Li JQ, Bi WJ, Sun CL, Fuel Process. Technol., 129, 156, 2015
- Tiwari P, Deo M, AIChE J., 58(2), 505, 2012
- Das P, Tiwari P, Thermochim. Acta, 654, 191, 2017
- Han TU, Kim YM, Watanabe A, Teramae N, Park YK, Kim S, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 34(4), 1214, 2017
- Kim JW, Lee SH, Kim SS, Park SH, Jeon JK, Park YK, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 28(9), 1867, 2011
- Bartocci P, Tschentscher R, Stensrød RE, Barbanera M, Frantozzi F, Molecules, 24, 1657, 2019
- Friedman HL, J. Polym. Sci. C, 6, 183, 1964
- Kissinger H, J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand., 57, 217, 1956
- Akahira T, Sunose T, Res. Rep. Chiba. Inst. Technol., 16, 22, 1971
- Ozawa T, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 38, 1881, 1965
- Flynn JH, Wall LA, Polym. Lett., 4, 323, 1966
- Doyle CD, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 6, 639, 1961
- Criado JM, Thermochim. Acta, 24, 186, 1978
- Perez-Maqueda LA, Criado JM, Gotor FJ, Malek J, J. Phys. Chem. A, 106(12), 2862, 2002
|