About The Journal
  Aims and Scope
  Editorial Board
  Submit a Manuscript 
  Subscription Information
Articles & Issues
  Issue
  Search
For Authors
  Instructions to Authors
  Ethics in Publishing
  Peer Review Process
  Author's Checklist
  Copyright Transfer Form
Contact us
 
 
 
 
Search / Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering
Korean Chemical Engineering Research,
Vol.47, No.6, 781-787, 2009
직·간접석탄액화공정의 경제성 평가
Economic Evaluations of DCL/ICL Processes
박주원, 배종수, 권영진, 김학주, 정헌, 한춘
석탄액화(Coal to Liquid, CTL) 공정은 직접액화(Direct Coal Liquefaction, DCL) 공정과 간접액화(Indirect Coal Liquefaction, ICL) 공정으로 대분되며, 각 공정의 경제성을 분석하기 위하여 주요 제품(디젤, 납사) 생산량이 50,000 barrel per day(BPD)의 직·간접석탄액화공정을 선정하고 공정에 적합한 검토기준을 세워 건설비용 및 매출액 등을 산정하였다. 또한 석탄액화공정에 대한 중요 변수들의 가격 변동에 따른 민감도 분석을 실시하였다. 생산량을 기준으로 선정된 원료탄(Illinois #6 유연탄)을 사용하였을 때, 총 투자액은 각각 DCL $3,994,858,000, ICL $4,962,263,000로 나타났다. 경제성 분석결과 내부수익률(internal rate of return, IRR)은 기본조건에서 각각 13.27%(DCL), 12.68%(ICL)로 나타났으며, 두 공정 모두 원료석탄 가격과 생산 제품 판매가에 가장 크게 영향을 받는 것으로 나타났다. 원금상환 기간은 DCL이 6.6년, ICL이 6.8년으로 나타났으며, 민감도 분석 결과 제품가격, 원료석탄가격, 건설비의 변동률 순서로 수익률에 변화를 주는 것으로 나타났다.
This report investigates the economic proprieties of commercial 50,000 barrel per day direct/indirect coal liquefaction(DCL/ICL) plants to produce commercial-grade diesel and naphtha liquids. The scope of the study includes capital and operating cost estimates, sensitivity analyses and a comparative financial analyses. Based on plant capacity of 50,000BPD, employing Illinois #6 bituminous coal as feed coal, the total capital cost appeared $3,994,858,000(DCL) and $4,962,263,000(ICL). Also, the internal rate of return of DCL/ICL appeared 13.27% and 12.68% on the base condition respectively. In this case, coal price and sale price of products were the most influence factors. And ICL’s payback period(6.8 years) was longer than DCL’s(6.6 years). According to sensitivity analyses, the important factors on both DCL/ICL processes were product sale price, feed coal price and the capital cost in order.
Keywords: Coal to Liquid; Direct Coal Liquefaction; Indirect Coal Liquefaction; Sensitivity Analysis; Economic Evaluation
[References]
  1. U. S. DOE, Energy Information Administration, "Annual Energy Outlook 2007 with Projections to 2030", (http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/aeo/coal.html), 2007
  2. Japan, New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization, "Clean Coal Technologies in Japan," (http://www.nedo. go.jp/sekitan/cct/)
  3. Schindler HD, DOE/Er-0400, vol. II, 1989
  4. Coal Research Establishment, Annual Report, p. 281(1987/1988)
  5. Park JW, Park C, Kim HJ, Jung H, Han C, Korean Chem. Eng. Res., 46(2), 248, 2008
  6. Gulf professional publishing, "Conceptual Cost Estimating Manual 2nd Edition", 1996
  7. Comolli AG, Hydrocarbon Technologies inc., 1996
  8. Schindler HD, Chen JM, Potts JD, Final Technical Report DOE Contract DEAC22-79ET14804, June, 1983
  9. Headwaters energy services, "Coal-to-liquid Technology Options", June 10, 2007
  10. Steynberg A, "Overview of Sasol CTL Technologies & Recent Activities," The Montana Symposium Energy Future of the West, 2005
  11. DOE/NETL, "Baseline Technical and Economic Assessment of a Commercial Scale Fischer-Tropsch Liquids Facility", 2007
  12. Park JW, Kweon WJ, Kim HJ, Jung H, Han C, Korean Chem. Eng. Res., 47(1), 127, 2009
[Cited By]
  1. Lee JH, Kim JH, Lee IY, Jang KR, Shim JG, Korean Chemical Engineering Research, 49(2), 244, 2011
  2. Bae JS, Hwang IS, Kweon YJ, Choi YC, Park SJ, Kim HJ, Jung H, Han C, Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 29(7), 868, 2012
  3. Shin BC, Kwak H, Lee KM, Korean Chemical Engineering Research, 50(4), 646, 2012
  4. Gwak IS, Hwang JH, Lee SH, Applied Chemistry for Engineering, 27(2), 171, 2016
  5. Shin JH, Lee LS, Lee SH, Korean Chemical Engineering Research, 54(4), 501, 2016
  6. Seo SB, Cho IH, Yun HP, Kang SY, Kim HW, Lee SH, Clean Technology, 25(4), 289, 2019
참고문헌정보(참고문헌, 인용문헌)는 화학공학소재연구정보센터에 의해 제공되고 있습니다.