Search / Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering
Korean Chemical Engineering Research,
Vol.47, No.2, 248-257, 2009
배출량산정모델과 다중매질모델링을 이용한 환경오염물질의 노출평가 및 위해도 평가
Prediction of Exposure and Risks of Environmental Pollutants via Emission Assessment and Multimedia Transport Modeling
본 연구에서는 배출량산정모델과 다중매질모델을 활용하여 환경오염물질의 노출도를 예측하였으며 위해도를 평가하였다. 연구대상 화학물질로써 8종(아세트알데히드(acetaldehyde), 아크릴로니트릴(acrylonitrile), 아닐린(aniline), 벤젠(benzene), 사염화탄소(carbon tetrachloride), 디클로로메탄(dichloromethane), 포름알데히드(formaldehyde), 염화비닐(vinyl chloride))의 물질을 선택하였으며, 대상지역은 공단지역을 포함하는 도심 지역을 선택하였다. 배출량은 지리지형정보를 활용하여 점배출원과 비점배출원을 동시에 고려하여 산정하였으며, 다중매질모델은 지역적 특성을 반영할 수 있는 모델을 선택하였다. 유해성 자료는 미국 환경청의 IRIS(Integrated Risk Information System) 유해성 데이터베이스를 활용하였다. 모델링 자료와 유해성 자료를 이용하여 위해성을 평가한 결과, 물질별로 위해도가 높은 지역을 발견할 수 있었으며 우선적으로 관리해야 할 물질을 선별할 수 있었다.
In this paper, human exposure and risk of environmental pollutants were predicted using an emission assessment model and multimedia fate model. Eight environmental pollutants, acetaldehyde, acrylonitrile, aniline, benzene, carbon tetrachloride, dichloromethane, formaldehyde and vinyl chloride, were selected for the risk assessment in an urban and industrial area in Korea. The emission rate of target pollutants were estimated after considering a variety of point and non-point emission sources including geographical information. A spatially refined multimedia fate model was applied to predict the environmental concentration and fate of pollutants. Hazard data of target materials were obtained from the IRIS(Integrated Risk Information System) database. Using the modeling results with hazard data, the human risks were assessed. Modeling results demonstrate that the considerable risks were observed for several pollutants.
[References]
  1. Allen DT, Shonnard DR, Green engineering - environmentally conscious design of chemical processes, Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, NJ07458, 2002
  2. Symeonidis P, Ziomass I, Proyou A, Environ. Modell. Softw., 19, 413, 2004
  3. Pai P, Niemi D, Powers B, Fuel Process. Technol., 65, 101, 2000
  4. Zhihui W, Yuhua B, Shuyu Z, Atmos. Environ., 37, 3771, 2003
  5. Baldasano JM, Guereca LP, Lopez E, Gasso S, Jimenez-Guerrero P, Atmos. Environ., 42, 7215, 2008
  6. Buzcu-Guven B, Fraser MP, Atmos. Environ., 42, 5032, 2008
  7. Kim NT, Martel OM, Pongkiatkul P, Berkowicz R, Atmos. Res., 89, 223, 2008
  8. Prrish DD, Atmos. Environ., 40, 2288, 2006
  9. Skjoth CA, Geels C, Hvidberg M, Hertel O, Brandt J, Frohn LM, Hansen KM, Hedegard GB, Christensen JH, Moseholm L, Ecol. Model., 217, 292, 2008
  10. Wang H, Chen C, Huang C, Fu L, Sci. Tot. Environ., 398, 60, 2008
  11. Toxic Release Inventory Support System, http://tri.nier.go.kr.
  12. Korea Chemicals Management Association webpage, http://www.kcma.or.kr.
  13. Traffic Monitoring System, http://www.road.re.kr.
  14. Korea Transport Database, http://www.ktdb.go.kr.
  15. Korea Energy Economics Institute, Report on Energy Census, Ministry of Commerce, Industry and Energy, GOVP1200629004, 2004
  16. National Air Pollutants Emission, http://airemiss.nier.go.kr.
  17. Kim MS, Kim JH, Park HS, Sun YS, Kim HS, Choi KH, Yi J, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 23(6), 919, 2006
  18. Kim MS, Kim JH, Park HS, Sun YS, Kim HS, Choi KH, Yi J, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 24, 762, 2007
  19. Mackay D, Environ. Sci. Technol., 13, 1219, 1979
  20. Mackay D, Diamond M, Chemosphere, 18, 1343, 1989
  21. Mackay D, Paterson M, Environ. Sci. Technol., 25, 427, 1991
  22. van de Meent D, SimpleBOX: A Generic Multi-media Fate Evaluation Model. RIVM Report No. 6727200001. Bilthoven, The Netherlands, 1993
  23. Deviller J, Bintein S, Chemosphere, 30, 457, 1995
  24. Fenner K, Scheringer M, Hungerbuhler K, Environ. Sci. Technol., 34, 3809, 2000
  25. Tao S, Yang Y, Cao HY, Liu WX, Coveney RM, Xu FL, Cao J, Li BG, Wang XJ, Hu JY, Fang JY, Environ. Pollut., 139, 183, 2006
  26. Cousins IT, Mackay D, Chemosphere, 44, 643, 2001
  27. Suzuki N, Murasawa K, Sakurai T, Nansai K, Matsuhashi K, Moriguchi Y, Tanabe K, Nakasugi O, Morita M, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 5682, 2004
  28. Wania F, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 3, 39, 1996
  29. Woodfine D, Macleod M, Mackay D, Environ. Pollut., 119, 341, 2002
  30. Zhang Q, Crittenden JC, Sonnard D, Mihelcic JR, Chemosphere, 50, 1377, 2003
  31. Prevedouros K, MacLeod M, Jones KC, Sweetman AJ, Environ. Pollut., 128, 251, 2004
  32. Luo Y, Gao Q, Yang X, J. Environ. Manage., 83, 44, 2007
  33. Yi J, Shin CB, Lee WG, Development of National Pollution Map using Multi-media Fate Model with Emission Inventories for the Construction of Pollutant Source Management System, ECO-Technopia-21 project of Ministry of Environmental, Korea, 091051039, 2008
  34. USEPA, Integrated Risk Information System(IRIS), http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/iris/index.cfm.
  35. Dai J, Rocke DM, Environ. Model. Soft., 15, 293, 2000
  36. Mackay D, Multimedia Environmental Fate Model: The Fugacity Approach, Second ed. Lewis publishers, Boca Raton, Florida, 2001
  37. Korea Meterological Administration webpage, http://www.kma. go.kr.
  38. Seinfeld JH, Pandis SN, Atmopspheric Chemistry and Physics from Air Pollution to Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, INC., New York, 1998
  39. Water Management Information System, http://www.wamis.go.kr.
  40. Jenson SK, Domingue JO, Photogramm. Eng. Rem. S., 54, 1593, 1988
  41. Maidment DR, ARC Hydro - GIS for Water Resources, First ed. ESRI Press, Redlands, California, 2002
  42. Chapra SC, Surface Water-quality Modeling, Second ed. McGraw-Hill, New York(, 1997
  43. Priemer DA, Diamond ML, Environ. Sci. Technol., 36, 1004, 2002
  44. Trapp S, Matthies M, Chemodynamics and Environmental Modeling: An Introduction. First ed. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 1998
  45. National Institute of Environmental Research, http://www.nier.go.kr.