Search / Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering
HWAHAK KONGHAK,
Vol.34, No.4, 418-423, 1996
반응표면분석법을 이용한 알파셀룰로오스 가수분해 반응조건 최적화
Optimiaztion of Opera- tion Conditions for the Hydrolysis of Cellulose by Response Surface Methodology
환원당의 농도를 극대화시키기 위하여, 반응표면분석법을 이용하여 섬유소 가수분해 반응조건을 최적화 시키고자 하였다. 효소역가, 기질농도, 그리고 반응온도를 독립변수로 선정하였으며, 종속변수로는 환원당 농도와 생산수율(단위효소당 환원당 농도)을 정하고, 분석하였다. 3변수, 3수준, 분류인자 실험계획법에 따라 5가지 스타포인트와 4번의 중심점 반복실험을 포함하여, 모두 17가지 조건에서 실험을 수행하였다. 본 실험에서 얻은 섬유소 가수분해의 최적조건은 효소역가가 274 FPU, 기질농도가 8.9%, 그리고 반응온도는 51℃이었으며, 이 조건에서 최대 환원당 농도, 47.89 g/L를 얻었다.
To obtain the maximize the concentration of reducing sugar, optimum operating conditions for the hydrolysis of cellolose was investigated by using the response surface methodology. The independent variables were enzyme activity, substrate concentration and reaction temperature and reducing sugar concentration and production yield(reducing sugar concentration per amount of enzyme) were dependent variables. Following the 33-fractional factorial experimental design, 17 experiments were carried out at various conditions, with 5 starpoints and 4 replicates at the center point. The optimum condition for the hydrolysis of cellulose was as follows, enzyme activity; 274 FPU, substrate concentration; 8.9%, and reaction temperature; 51℃. The maximum production of reducing sugar, 47.89 g/L, was ob- tained in this optimum condition.
[References]
  1. Nowell GP, Energy Policy, Sep., 652, 1990
  2. Ghose TK, Roychoury PK, Ghosh P, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 26, 377, 1984
  3. Takagi M, Abe S, Suzuki S, Emert GH, Yata N, Proceed. Bioconversion Symp., IIT, 551, 1977
  4. Wright JD, Chem. Eng. Prog., 62, 1988
  5. Okazaki M, Moo-Young M, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 20, 637, 1978
  6. Holtzapple MT, Caram HS, Humphery AE, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 26, 775, 1984
  7. Philippidis GP, Smith TK, Wyman CE, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 41, 846, 1993
  8. Spindler DD, Wyman CE, Grohmann K, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 34, 189, 1989
  9. Ghose TK, Pure Appl. Chem., 59(2), 257, 1987
  10. Lee JM, "Biochemical Engineering," Prentice Hall, New Jersey, p. 94, 1992
  11. Miller GL, Anal. Chem., 31, 426, 1959
  12. Bergmeyer HU, Bernt E, Methods Enzymatic Anal., 13, 1205, 1974
  13. Huang SY, Chen JCJ, Ferment. Technol., 66(5), 509, 1988
  14. Oh KK, Jung HW, Park JY, Lim JK, Kim JC, Korean J. Food Sci. Technol., 25(1), 1, 1993
  15. Sattler W, Esterbauer H, Glatter O, Steiner W, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 33, 1221, 1989
  16. Kautola H, Gronlund B, Horitsr H, Linko YY, Linko P, Proc. 4th European Congress on Biotechnology, 1, 106, 1987
  17. Kautola H, Vassilev N, Linko YY, J. Biotechnol., 13, 315, 1990
  18. Box GEP, Hunter G, Hunter JS, "Statistics for Experimenters," John Wiley & Sons, N.Y., p. 510, 1978
  19. Kautola H, Vassilev N, Linko YY, Biotechnol. Lett., 11(5), 313, 1989