Search / Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering
HWAHAK KONGHAK,
Vol.30, No.5, 594-604, 1992
혼합좌표계를 이용하는 Finite Element Method에 대한 충진층의 유체-고체계 해석-I. 충진층 흡착관의 수치모사
Analysis of Fluid-Solid System in a Fixed-Bed by Finite Element Method Using Mixed Coordinate-I. Numerical Simulation of a Fixed-Bed adsorption Column
원통좌표와 구좌표로 구성된 혼합 좌표계를 이용하여 흡착제 충진층 흡착관의 수치해를 구하고자 finite ele- ment method(FEM)를 흡착관의 모델식에 적용하였다. 이 혼합 좌표계는 두 좌표계를 연결하는 flux term을 쉽게 처리할 수 있었다. 세 가지 Peclet 수에 대한 breakthrough 곡선은 수학적인 해석해와 잘 일치하였으며, 관의 입구에서 Dirichlet 경계조건은 근사해와 해석해의 편차를 일으켰다. Danckwerts경계조건은 계가 획산 율속이더라도 경계에서 확산속을 억제함을 알 수 있었으며, Peclet수가 적을 경우의 해의 큰 편차는 관의 입구에서 확산속 때문이다. 본 simulation 결과는 Danckwerts 경계조건의 세 가지 Peclet수에 해석해와 잘 일치하였다.
The Finite Element Method(FEM) was formulated for numerical solution of a fixed-bed adsorp-tion column using mixed coordinate system which consists of a cylindrical and spherical coordinates. The mixed coordinate system is implemented by connecting of interfacial resistances between two coordinates. The breakthrough curves for three Peclet numbers are simulated and then compared with an exact analytic solution. The finite element solution obtained by adopting the Dirichlet boundary conditions as the inlet gives larger disagreements with an exact analytic solution. The merit of the Danckwerts boundary condition is that it prohibits the diffusion flux at the boundary even though the system is diffusion dominated. The larger disagreements in solutions especially when the Peclet number is small might be caused by the diffusion flux at the inlet. The simulation results agree good with analytical solutions for three defferent Peclet numbers.
[References]
  1. Meyer OA, Weber TW, AIChE J., 13, 457, 1967
  2. Lee RG, Weber TW, Can. J. Chem. Eng., 47, 54, 1969
  3. Deans HA, Lapidus L, AIChE J., 6, 656, 1960
  4. McGurie ML, Lapidus L, AIChE J., 11, 85, 1965
  5. Froment GF, Chem. Eng. Sci., 7, 29, 1961
  6. Froment GF, Ind. Eng. Chem., 59, 18, 1967
  7. Lerou JJ, Froment GF, Chem. Eng. Sci., 32, 853, 1977
  8. Kheshgi HS, Hagan PS, Reyes SC, Pirkle JC, AIChE J., 34, 1373, 1988
  9. McGreavy C, Cresswell DL, Can. J. Chem. Eng., 47, 583, 1969
  10. Feick J, Ouon D, Can. J. Chem. Eng., 48, 205, 1970
  11. Villadsen JV, Stewart WE, Chem. Eng. Sci., 22, 1483, 1967
  12. Stewart WE, Villadsen JV, AIChE J., 15, 28, 1969
  13. Finlayson BA, Chem. Eng. Sci., 26, 1081, 1971
  14. Hansen KW, Chem. Eng. Sci., 26, 1555, 1971
  15. Young LC, Finlayson BA, Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam., 12, 413, 1973
  16. Karanth NG, Hughes R, Chem. Eng. Sci., 29, 197, 1974
  17. Ferguson NB, Finlayson BN, AIChE J., 20, 540, 1974
  18. Sharma CS, Hughes R, Chem. Eng. Sci., 34, 613, 1979
  19. Gros JB, Bugarel R, Chem. Eng. J., 13, 165, 1977
  20. Villadson J, Michelsen ML, "Solution of Differencial Equation Models by Polynomial Approximation," Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1978
  21. Jensen KF, Ray WH, Chem. Eng. Sci., 37, 199, 1982
  22. Raghavan NS, Duncan TW, Ruthven DM, Chem. Eng. J., 26, 223, 1983
  23. Liapis AI, Rippin DWT, Chem. Eng. Sci., 33, 593, 1978
  24. Liapis AI, Litchfield RJ, Chem. Eng. Sci., 35, 2366, 1980
  25. Marcussen L, Chem. Eng. Sci., 37, 299, 1982
  26. Raghavan NS, Ruthven DM, AIChE J., 29, 923, 1983
  27. Raghavan NS, Ruthvan DM, Chem. Eng. Sci., 39, 1201, 1984
  28. Giudice SD, Tratta A, Chem. Eng. Sci., 33, 697, 1978
  29. Mills PL, Lai S, Dudukovic MP, Ramachandran PA, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 27, 191, 1988
  30. Mills PL, Lai S, Dudukovic MP, Ramachandran PA, Comput. Chem. Eng., 12, 37, 1988
  31. Gardini L, Servida A, Morbidelli M, Carra S, Comput. Chem. Eng., 9, 1, 1985
  32. Carey GF, Finlayson BA, Chem. Eng. Sci., 30, 587, 1975
  33. Finlayson BA, "Nonlinear Analysis in Chemical Engng," McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980
  34. Khanna R, Seinfield JH, Adv. Chem. Eng., 13, 113, 1987
  35. Garga-Garza O, Dudukovic MP, Comput. Chem. Eng., 6, 131, 1982
  36. Hlavacek V, Rompay PV, Chem. Eng. Sci., 36, 1587, 1981
  37. Tezduyar TE, Deans HA, Park YO, Park PW, World Congress III of Chem. Eng., 247, 913-257 in Reactor Design. Sept. 21-23, Tokyo, Japan, 1986
  38. Tezduyar TE, Park YO, Comput. Meth. Mech. Engng., 59, 307, 1986
  39. Tezduyar TE, Park YO, Deans HA, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 7, 1013, 1986
  40. Park YO, Dean HA, Tezduyar TE, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 11, 769, 1990
  41. Park PW, Park YO, Fourth World Congress of Chem. Eng., 6. 1-8, June 16-21, Karlsruhe, Germany, 1991
  42. Rasmuson A, Neretnieks I, AIChE J., 26, 686, 1980
  43. Raghavan NS, Ruthven DM, AIChE J., 29, 922, 1983
  44. Deisler PF, Wilhelm RH, Ind. Eng. Chem., 45, 1219, 1953
  45. Bubcock RE, Green DW, Perry RH, AIChE J., 12, 922, 1966
  46. Rosen JB, J. Chem. Phys., 20, 387, 1952
  47. Park YO, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Houston, 1989