Search / Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering
Korean Chemical Engineering Research,
Vol.58, No.1, 21-28, 2020
Studies on Skin Permeation with Polymer Micelles and the Cell Penetrating Peptide of Pyrus Serotina Var Stem Extracts
The stem extract from Pyrus serotina var has natural antioxidant ability, but the extraction method does not result in a soluble compound in cosmetic formulations. This study investigated the cosmetic efficacy of the Pyrus serotina var stem extract and its epidermis permeation ability when combined with polymer micelles and a cell penetrating peptide. The total concentration of polyphenol compounds was determined to be 103.1644 ± 1.38 mg/g in the ethanol extract and 78.97 ± 1.45 mg/g in the hydrothermal extract. The 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging effects were 55.94 ± 0.22% in the ethanol extract at 1,000 mg/L. Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity rates were 104.05 ± 3.28% in the ethanol extract at 62.5 mg/L. The elastase inhibition rate was 67.21 ± 2.72% in the ethanol extract at 1,000 mg/L. An antimicrobial effect was observed in the Propionibacterium acnes strain. In the epidermal permeability experiment, it was confirmed that formulation of the polymer micelle containing the Pyrus serotina var stem extract and cell penetrating peptide (R6, hexa-D-arginine) showed small particle size and much better skin permeability. The cumulative amount of total Pyrus serotina var stem extract that penetrated to the skin over time increased over 24 hours in three formulations. The three formulations showed 51.61 μg/cm2 (Formulation 0), 75.97 μg/cm2 (Formulation 1) and 95.23 μg/cm2 (Formulation 2) skin penetration, respectively. Therefore, it was confirmed that the ethanol extracts of Pyrus serotina var stem showed good cosmetic efficacy and excellent epidermis permeation ability when combined with a polymer micelle and cell penetrating peptide. Thus, this extract has the potential to be used as a safe and natural cosmetic material in the future.
[References]
  1. Oh MH, Park HJ, Lee SH, Park SY, J. Aesth. Cosmet. Soc., 8(3), 175, 2010
  2. Lee SJ, Park DW, Jang HG, Kim CY, Park YS, Kim TC, Heo BG, J. Hort. Sci. Technol., 24(3), 338, 2006
  3. Chae KY, Kwon SS, Park SN, Appl. Chem. Eng., 24(3), 260, 2013
  4. Yang HG, Kim HJ, Kim HS, Park SN, J. Soc. Cosmet. Sci., 24(2), 190, 2013
  5. Park SJ, Yang YJ, Shim SY, Seo DH, Appl. Chem. Eng., 13(7), 697, 2002
  6. Kim SJ, Jeong YL, Nam JJ, Jang JH, Yeo HL, Yoon MS, Yoo KJ, Lee JB, J. Soc. Cosmet. Sci., 42(1), 9, 2016
  7. Lim GN, Kim SY, Kim MJ, Park SN, Polymer, 36(4), 420, 2012
  8. Lundberg P, Langel U, J. Mol. Recognit., 16(5), 227, 2003
  9. Wender PA, Mitchell DJ, Pattabiraman K, Pelkey ET, Steinman L, Rothbard JB, PNAS, 97(24), 13003, 2000
  10. Folin O, Denis W, J. Biol. Chem., 12(2), 239, 1912
  11. Blois MS, Nature, 181, 1199, 1958
  12. Cannell RJ, Kellam SJ, Owsianka AM, Walker JM, Planata Med., 54(1), 10, 1988
  13. Kubo KI, J. Agric. Food. Chem., 47(10), 4121, 1999
  14. Marklund S, Marklund G, Eur. J. Biochem., 47(3), 469, 1974
  15. Ko MO, Kang HJ, Hwang JH, Yang KW, J. Soc. Cosmet. Sci., 44(1), 59, 2018
  16. Park CI, Park, GH, J. Herbol., 31(4), 53, 2016
  17. Kligman D, Dermatol Clin, 18(4), 609, 2000
  18. Briganti S, Camera E, Picardo M, Pigment Cell. Res., 16(2), 101, 2003
  19. Kim JG, Son JH, Kor. Beek. Assoc., 11(1), 8, 1996
  20. An GM, Park SI, Kim MG, Shin MS, J. Invest. Cosmetol., 14(4), 455, 2018