|
Search / Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering
|
Korean Chemical Engineering Research, Vol.57, No.2, 164-171, 2019
Study of Protonation Behaviour and Distribution Ratios of Hydroxamic Acids in Hydrochloric and Perchloric Acid Solutions Through Hammett Acidity Function, Bunnett-Olsen and Excess Acidity Method
The protonation parameters, dissociation constants (pKBH+) of conjugate acid, slope values (m, φ and m*) and correlation coefficients (r) of hydroxamic acids were determined by Hammett acidity function method, Bunnett- Olsen method and excess acidity method in hydrochloric and perchloric acid solutions. Effect of acid concentration on partition and percentage protonation was also studied. pKBH+ values show that hydroxamic acids do not behave as Hammett bases, but hydroxamic acids behave as weak bases in strong acidic solutions. The values of pKBH+ obtained through Bunnett-Olsen method and excess acidity method were compared with the Hammett acidity function. ChemAxon's MarvinSketch 6.1.5 software was also used for determining pKa, pI and microspecies distribution (%) of hydroxamic acids with pH. Hydrogen donor and acceptor values and logD were also obtained. The results show that N-p-chlorophenyl-4- bromobenzohydroxamic acid has the highest pKa and lowest logD values. On the contrary, N-phenyl-3,5-dinitrobenzohydroxamic acid has lowest the pKa and highest logD values.
[References]
- Garcia VS, Gonzalez VDG, Vega JR, Marcipar IS, Gugliotta LM, Latin Am. Appl. Res., 42, 405, 2012
- Kostiainen R, Kotiaho T, Kuuranne TS, J. Mass Spec., 38, 357, 2003
- Yadav SS, Pande R, Khare D, Tripathi M, J. Chem. Thermodyn., 54, 76, 2012
- Singh P, Pande R, J. Fluoresc., 26, 67, 2016
- Singh P, Khare D, Pande R, Chem. Pap., 68(10), 1298, 2014
- Vernon F, Eccles H, The Theory and Practice Ion Exchange, London SCI 39.1 (1976).
- Sharma P, Obrai S, Kumar R, Chem. Bio. Phy. Sci. Sec. A, 3, 91, 2013
- Hassan KF, Kandil SA, Abdel-Aziz HM, Siyam T, Chromatogr. Res. Int., 2011, 1, 2011
- Gidwani MS, Kaur H, Pal U, Menon SK, J. Anal. Chem., 64, 104, 2009
- Farkas E, Enyedy EA, Zekany L, Deak G, J. Inorg. Biochem., 83, 107, 2001
- Jiao C, Zhang Z, Tao J, Zhang D, Chen Y, Lin H, RSC Adv., 7, 27787, 2017
- Tondon SG, Bhattacharya SC, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 7, 553, 1962
- Gupta VK, Tondon SG, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 17, 257, 1972
- Marziano NC, Cimino GM, Passerini RC, J. Chem. Soc.-Perkin Trans. 2, 64, 1253, 1977
- Csizmadia A, Tsantili-Kakoulidou I, Pander F, Darvas, J. Pharm. Sci., 86, 865, 1997
- Cox RA, Yates K, Can. J. Chem., 61, 2225, 1983
- Cox RA, Stewart R, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 98, 488, 1976
- Cox RA, Yates K, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 100, 3861, 1978
- Cox RA, Yates K, Can. J. Chem., 59, 2116, 1981
- Buglass AJ, Hudson K, Tillet J, J. Chem. Soc. Sec. B, 42, 123, 1971
- Zhang S, Zhang T, Tang SW, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 61(6), 2088, 2016
- Bunnett JF, Olsen FP, Can. J. Chem., 44, 1899, 1966
- Arnett EM, Prog. Phys. Org. Chem., 1, 223, 1963
- Vernon F, Khorassani IH, Talanta, 25, 410, 1978
- Pande R, Tandon SG, Talanta, 38, 1015, 1991
- Monzyk BF, United States Patent: 5174917(1992).
- Zhang W, Pranolo Y, Urbani M, Cheng CY, Hydrometallurgy, 119-120, 67, 2012
- Ghosh KK, Indian J. Chemistry, 40A, 2683, 2003
- Garcia B, Ibeas S, Hoyuelos FJ, Leal JM, Secco F, Venturini M, J. Org. Chem., 66, 7986, 2001
- Beccia MR, Coordination chemistry. Universita degli studi di Pisa, pp. 7-9(2012).
|