Search / Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering
Korean Chemical Engineering Research,
Vol.55, No.4, 497-502, 2017
A Study on the Importance of Uninsured (Indirect) Cost Item of Workplace Accidents
Estimation of accident cost is a sound and great safety indicator on determining accurate occupational safety and health prevention. Just like in Korea, Heinrich ratio analysis of (1:4) between direct and indirect costs has been become widely used in safety management because of its simplicity. In this study four major categories of uninsured (indirect) cost items and 18 sub-categories of uninsured (indirect) cost items were identified. To determine and validate the importance and necessity of the results of a literature review an expert or professional surveyed had been analyses using the SPSS 18.0, where in the participants whose expertize is in the field of compensation and safety. Based on the results of survey all participants all uninsured (indirect) cost items classified was important and necessary when accidents occurred. Despite recognition of expert on the classification of uninsured (indirect) cost items, it is quite difficult to make generalization for all kind of costs in occupational accident case due to different nature of business for each industry.
[References]
  1. Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency (KOSHA), Statistics on Occupational Accidents in 2014 (2014).
  2. Ministry of Employment and Labor (MOEL), Industrial Accident Analysis 2014 (2014).
  3. Berger M, Murray J, Xu J, Pauly M, Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 43, 18-24(2001).
  4. Aaltonen M, Uusi-Rauva E, Saari J, Antti-Poika M, Rasanen T, Vinni K, Safety Science, 23(1), 11, 1996
  5. Andreoni D, Bureau International du Travail(1985).
  6. Bird F, Germain G, “A New Horizon in Accident Prevention and Cost Improvement,” New York(1966).
  7. Brody B, Letourneau Y, Poirier A, Journal of Occupational Accidents, 13, 255-270(1990).
  8. J. Dent. Child., Everett J, Frank P, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 122, 158-164(1996).
  9. Heinrich H, Industrial Accident Prevention, fourth edition, New York, 1959, first edition(1931).
  10. Head L, Harcourt M, In Proceedings of the 11th AIRAANZ Conference, January 30 - February 1 1997, Brisbane, Australia, Jun. 01(2004).
  11. Labelle J, Determining total incident costs, Professional Safety, pp. 38-42, April (2000).
  12. Laufer A, Journal of Occupational Accidents, 8, 295-315(1987).
  13. Leigh J, Markowitz S, Fahs M, Shin C, Landrigan P, Archives of Internal Medicine, 157(14), 1557, 1997
  14. Leigh JP, Waehrer G, Miller TR, Keenan C, Scandinavian Journal of Work and Environmental Health, 30, 199-205(2004).
  15. Leopold E, Leonard S, Journal of Occupational Accidents, 8, 273-294(1987).
  16. Linhard J, Journal of Safety Research, 36, 257-260.
  17. Miller P, Haslam C, Safety Science, 47, 163, 2009
  18. Monnery N, Safety Science, 31, 59, 1999
  19. Oxenburgh M, Marlow P, Journal of Safety Researchn ECON Proceedings, 36, 209-214(2005).
  20. Oxenburgh M, Marlow P, Oxenburgh A, “Increasing Productivity and Profit Through Health & Safety,” 2nd edition, (2003).
  21. Paez O, Uahinui T, Genaidy A, Karwowski W, Sun L, Daraiseh N, Theoretical Issues In Ergonomics Science, 7(3), 247-26(2006).
  22. Pawlowska Z, Rzepecki J, Costs and Benefits of Occupational Safety and Health. Proceedings of the European Conference on Costs and benefits of Occupational Safety and Health, TNO, Amsterdam (1997).
  23. Rauner M, Harper P, Shahani A, Schwarz B, Safety Science Monitor, 9, (2005).
  24. Rikardsson P, Work in progress (2003).
  25. Rikhardsson P, Department of Accounting, Finance and Logistics, Aarhus School of Business(2005).
  26. Roche L, Economic Costs of Occupational Injury Fatalities in New Jersey in 1992, Bureau of Labor Statistics(1994).