Search / Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering
Korean Chemical Engineering Research,
Vol.54, No.5, 687-692, 2016
기포 유동층 반응기에서 굴참나무의 열분해반응 특성 연구
Pyrolysis of Quercus Variabilis in a Bubbling Fluidized Bed Reactor
바이오매스는 대체 에너지원으로서 재생가능하고 전 세계적으로 고르게 분포하고 있으며, 친환경적이고 탄소중립적이어서 많은 관심을 받고 있다. 굴참나무를 대상으로 바이오에너지 생산의 효용성을 알아보기 위해 기포 유동층 반응기를 이용하여 급속 열분해반응 특성 연구를 수행하였다. 반응 온도에 변화에 따른 생성물의 수율 변화를 확인하기 위해 400~550 oC의 온도범위에서 급속 열분해반응 실험을 진행하였고, 이때 바이오-오일의 수율은 36.98~39.14 wt%, 가스의 수율은 33.40~36.96 wt%의 값을 나타내었다. 바이오-오일의 발열량은 500 oC, 3.0×Umf 조건에서 20.18 MJ/kg을 나타내었다. 생성된 열분해 가스의 주 생성물은 CO2, CO 및 CH4이며 CO2의 선택성이 37.16~50.94 mol%로 가장 높았다. 바이오-오일은 푸르푸랄, 페놀과 이들의 유도체인 1-hydroxy-2-propanone, 2-methoxy-phenol, 1,2-benzendiol, 2,6-dimethoxy-phenol에 대한 높은 선택성을 가지고 있었다.
Biomass has been concerned as one of the alternative energy resources because it is renewable, abundant worldwide, eco-friendly, and carbon neutral. Quercus variabilis has been studied to understand pyrolysis reaction characteristics, and to evaluate the efficiency of bio-energy production from fast pyrolysis. Quercus variabilis were fast pyrolyzed in a bubbling fluidized bed reactor at various reaction conditions. The effects of pyrolysis temperature between 400 oC and 550 °C on product yields were investigated. The yield of bio-oil was changed between 36.98 wt% and 39.14 wt%, and those of gas yield was 33.40 and 36.96 wt% with increasing reaction temperature. The higher heating value (HHV) of bio-oil at 500 °C (3.0×Umf) was 20.18 MJ/kg. The gas compositions were similar for all reaction conditions such as CO, CO2 and CH4, and CO2 selectivity was the highest (37.16~50.94 mol%). The bio-oil has high selectivities for furfural, phenol and their derivatives such as 1-hydroxy-2-propanone, 2-methoxy-phenol, 1,2-benzendiol, 2,6-dimethoxy-phenol.
[References]
  1. Won JS, “The Study on Bio-oil Production from Biomass by Fast Pyrolysis,” Master’s Thesis, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea (2010).
  2. Kim DH, “A Study on Biomass Renewable Energy Use Pig Farming Waste,” Master’s Thesis, Tongmyong University, Busan, Korea(2009).
  3. Amidon TE, Wood CD, Shupe AM, Wang Y, Graves M, Liu SJ, J. Biobased Meterials Bioenergy, 2(2), 100, 2008
  4. Bridgwater AV, Biomass Bioenerg., 38, 68, 2012
  5. Nussbaumer T, Energy Fuels, 17(6), 1510, 2003
  6. Bridgwater AV, Maniatis K, “The Production of Biofuels by the Thermochemical Processing of Biomass,” In: Archer, MD., Barber, J., editors. Molecular to global photosynthesis., IC Press, London, pp. 521-612(2004).
  7. Choi GH, “Pyrolysis Characteristics for the Production of Bio-energy from Hemp by-products,” Master’s Thesis, Kangwon University, Samcheok, Korea(2012).
  8. Chea KS, Jo TS, Choi SH, Lee SM, Hwang HW, Choi JW, J. Korean Oil Chemists' Soc., 32, 148, 2015
  9. Kang HK, Lee IG, Lee KH, Kim BS, Jo TS, Chae KS, Park SH, Jung SC, Park YK, “Catalytic Rapid Pyrolysis of Quercus variabilis Over Nanoporous Catalyst,” Journal of nanomaterials, Article ID 251974, 6(2015).
  10. Annual Book of ASTM Standards(1997).
  11. Park JM, “Combustion and Pyrolysis of Pine and Conifer for the Prevention of Forest Fire,” Master’s Thesis, Kangwon University, Samcheok, Korea(2011).
  12. Demirbas A, Fuel, 76(5), 431, 1997
  13. Carrier M, Joubert JE, Danje S, Hugo T, Gorgens J, Knoetze J, Bioresour. Technol., 150, 129, 2013
  14. Czernik S, Bridgwater AV, Energy Fuels, 18(2), 590, 2004
  15. Mohan D, Pittman CU, Steele PH, Energy Fuels, 20(3), 848, 2006
  16. Kim SS, Agblevor FA, Bioresour. Technol., 169, 367, 2014
  17. Yathavan BK, Agblevor FA, Energy Fuels, 27(11), 6858, 2013
  18. Sanchez-Silva L, Lopez-Gonzalez D, Villasenor J, Sanchez P, Valverde JL, Bioresour. Technol., 109, 163, 2012
  19. Choi JW, Choi DH, Cho TS, Meier D, Mokchae Konghak, 34(6), 36, 2006
  20. Ngo TA, Kim J, Kim SS, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 19(1), 137, 2013