Search / Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering
Korean Chemical Engineering Research,
Vol.54, No.5, 606-611, 2016
The Prediction of Minimum Miscible Pressure for CO2 EOR using a Process Simulator
Carbon dioxide injection is a widely known method of enhanced oil recovery (EOR). It is critical for the CO2 EOR that the injected CO2 to reach a condition fully miscible with oil. To reach the miscible point, a certain level of pressure is required, which is known as minimum miscibility pressure (MMP). In this study, a MMP prediction method using a process simulator is proposed. To validate the results of the simulation, those are compared to a slim tube experiment and several empirical correlations of previous literatures. Aspen HYSYS is utilized as the process simulator to create a model of CO2/crude oil encounter. The results of the study show that the process simulator model is capable of predicting MMP and comparable to other published methods.
[References]
  1. Whorton LP, U.S. Patent No. 2,623,596. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (1952).
  2. NETL. CO2-EOR primer: Carbon dioxide enhanced oil recovery. Retrieved August 2014, from http://www.netl.doe.gov/file%20library/research/oil-gas/CO2_EOR_Primer.pdf. (2010).
  3. Shokir EMEM, J. Pet. Sci. Eng., 58(1), 173, 2007
  4. Jarrell PM, “Practical aspects of CO2 flooding. Richardson, Tex.: Henry L. Doherty Memorial Fund of AIME,” Society of Petroleum Engineers (2002).
  5. Yellig WF, Metcalfe RS, J. Pet. Technol., 32(01), 160, 1980
  6. Holm LW, Josendal VA, J. Pet. Technol., 26(12), 1, 1974
  7. Williams CA, Zana EN, Humphrys GE, “Use of the Peng-Robinson Equation of State to Predict Hydrocarbon Phase Behavior and Miscibility for Fluid Displacement. In SPE/DOE Enhanced Oil Recovery Symposium,” Society of Petroleum Engineers (1980).
  8. Holm LW, J. Pet. Technol., 38(08), 817, 1986
  9. Zick AA, A Combined Condensing/Vaporizing Mechanism in the Displacement of Oil by Enriched Gases. Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 5-8 October. SPE-15493-MS. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/15493-MS (1986).
  10. Christiansen RL, Haines HK, SPE Reserv. Eng., 2(04), 523, 1987
  11. Wu RS, Batycky JP, J. Can. Pet. Technol., 29(06), 1990
  12. Elsharkawy AM, Poettmann FH, Christiansen RL, Energy Fuels, 10(2), 443, 1996
  13. Rao DN, Fluid Phase Equilib., 139(1), 311, 1997
  14. Rao DN, Lee JI, J. Pet. Sci. Eng., 35(3), 247, 2002
  15. Council NP, Enhanced oil recovery - an analysis of the potential for enhanced oil recovery from known fields in the United States - 1976-2000, Washington, DC; 1976.
  16. Lee JI, “Effectiveness of Carbon Dioxide Displacement Under Miscible and Immiscible Conditions,” Report RR-40, Petroleum Recovery Inst., Calgary (1979).
  17. Stalkup FI, J. Pet. Technol., 35(04), 815, 1983
  18. Cronquist C, “Carbon Dioxide Dynamic Miscibility with Light Reservoir Oils,” Proc. Fourth Annual U.S. DOE Symposium, Tulsa, 28-30(1978).
  19. Orr FM, Jensen CM, Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 24(5), 485, 1984
  20. Glass O, Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 25(06), 927, 1985
  21. Enick RM, Holder GD, Morsi BI, SPE Reserv. Eng., 3(01), 81, 1988
  22. Harmon RA, Grigg RB, SPE Reserv. Eng., 3(04), 1, 1988
  23. Lange EA, “Correlation and Prediction of Residual Oil Saturation for Gas Injection EOR Processes,” In Symposium on improved oil recovery, 245-254(1996).
  24. Wang Y, adn Orr FM, J. Pet. Sci. Eng., 27(3), 151, 2000
  25. Huang YF, Huang GH, Dong MZ, Feng GM, J. Pet. Sci. Eng., 37(1), 83, 2003
  26. Yuan H, Johns RT, Egwuenu AM, Dindoruk B, SPE Reserv. Eng., 8(05), 418, 2005
  27. Shokrollahi A, Arabloo M, Gharagheizi F, Mohammadi AH, Fuel, 112, 375, 2013
  28. Jaubert JN, Mutelet F, Fluid Phase Equilib., 224(2), 285, 2004
  29. Jaubert JN, Vitu S, Mutelet F, Corriou JP, Fluid Phase Equilib., 237(1), 193, 2005