Search / Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering
Korean Chemical Engineering Research,
Vol.53, No.1, 46-52, 2015
Leaching Kinetics of Praseodymium in Sulfuric Acid of Rare Earth Elements (REE) Slag Concentrated by Pyrometallurgy from Magnetite Ore
A leaching kinetics was conducted for the purpose of recovery of praseodymium in sulfuric acid (H2SO4) from REE slag concentrated by the smelting reduction process in an arc furnace as a reactant. The concentration of H2SO4 was fixed at an excess ratio under the condition of slurry density of 1.500 g slag/L, 0.3 mol H2SO4, and the effect of temperatures was investigated under the condition of 30 to 80 oC. As a result, praseodymium oxide (Pr6O11) existing in the slag was completely converted into praseodymium sulfate (Pr2(SO4)3·8H2O) after the leaching of 5 h. On the basis of the shrinking core model with a shape of sphere, the first leaching reaction was determined by chemical reaction mechanism. Generally, the solubility of pure REEs decreases with the increase of leaching temperatures in sulfuric acid, but REE slag was oppositely increased with increasing temperatures. It occurs because the ash layer included in the slag is affected as a resistance against the leaching. By using the Arrhenius expression, the apparent activation energy of the first chemical reaction was determined to be 9.195 kJmol-1. In the second stage, the leaching rate is determined by the ash layer diffusion mechanism. The apparent activation energy of the second ash layer diffusion was determined to be 19.106 kJmol-1. These relative low activation energy values were obtained by the existence of unreacted ash layer in the REE slag.
[References]
  1. IUPAC, Nomenclature of Inorganic Chemistry, IUPAC Recommendations 2005(“Red book”), RSC Publishing, Cambridge (UK), ISBN: 0-85404-438-8, 2005
  2. Antolini E, Perez J, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 36(24), 15752, 2011
  3. Yu Z, Chen M, Rare Earth Elements and Their Applications, Metallurgical Industry Press, 1995
  4. Massari S, Ruberti M, Resources Policy, 38, 36, 2013
  5. Aarabi-Karasgani M, Rashchi F, Mostoufi N, Vahidi E, Hydrometallurgy, 102, 14, 2010
  6. Dehghan R, Noaparast M, Kolahdoozan M, Hydrometallurgy, 96, 275, 2009
  7. El-Nadi YA, Hydrometallurgy, 119-120, 23, 2012
  8. Kim CJ, Yoon HS, Chung KW, Lee JY, Kim SD, Shin SM, Lee SJ, Joe AR, Lee SI, Yoo SJ, Kim SH, Hydrometallurgy, 146, 133, 2014
  9. Yoon HS, Kim CJ, Chung KW, Lee SJ, Joe AR, Shin YH, Lee SI, Yoo SJ, Kim JG, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 31(4), 706, 2014
  10. Kostova I, Curr. Med. Chem., 5, 591, 2005
  11. Kul M, Topkaya Y, Karakaya I, Hydrometallurgy, 93, 129, 2008
  12. Liu K, Chen Q, Yin Z, Hu H, Ding Z, Hydrometallurgy, 125, 125, 2012
  13. Manhique AJ, Focke WW, Carvalho M, Hydrometallurgy, 109, 230, 2011
  14. Minting L, Chang W, Shuang Q, Xuejiao Z, Cunxiong L, Zhigan D, Hydrometallurgy, 104, 193, 2010
  15. Moldoveanu GA, Papangelakis VG, Hydrometallurgy, 117-118, 71, 2012
  16. Yoo SJ, Yoon HS, Jang HD, Lee MJ, Lee SI, Hong ST, Park HS, Chem. Eng. J., 133(1-3), 79, 2007
  17. Yoo SJ, Kwak DH, Lee JW, Hwang UY, Jang HD, Hydrometallurgy, 96, 223, 2009
  18. Levenspiel O, Chemical Reaction Engineering, 3rd ed., Wiley, New York, 1999
  19. Schmidt LD, The Engineering of Chemical Reactions, 2nd ed., Oxford University Press, 2005
  20. Dickinson CF, Heal GR, Thermochim. Acta, 340-341, 89, 1999
  21. Orfao JJM, Martins FG, Thermochim. Acta, 390(1-2), 195, 2002
  22. Akinlua A, Torto N, Ajayi TR, Fuel, 87(8-9), 1469, 2008
  23. Lichtfouse E (ed.), Organic Farming, Pest Control and Remediation of Soil Pollutants, Sustainable Agriculture Review 1, Springer Science+Business Media B.V, 2009
  24. Clavier N, Podor R, Dacheux N, J. European Ceram. Soc., 31, 941, 2011
  25. HSC Chemistry 5.0 Chemical Reaction and Equilibrium Software with Extensive Thermochemical Database. Ver 5.11, Outokumpu Research, Finland.